Bible Believers' Newsletter 572
"We focus on the present Truth – what Jesus is doing now. . ."
Christian greetings in the wonderful Name of our Lord Jesus Christ, and thank you for joining us in fellowship around God's unchanging Word; we extend an especial welcome to our new subscribers.
Please welcome your fellow-subscriber, guest contributor Gilad Atzmon, a jazz musician, composer, producer and writer, born in Israel but living in England. Brother Gilad renounced his Jewishness and accepted Jesus Messiah, recognizing He is Jehovah of the Old Testament clothed in virgin-born flesh to pay the price of sin. Whilst we do not concur with everything expressed here by Brother Gilad, He can war on so many fronts, and like Paul he must be "all things to all those he is trying to reach, that he might by all means save some . . . as a firebrand plucked out of the burning".
In conformity with the Babylonian Talmud (Kethuboth 111a, note 52), Baruch Levy wrote: "The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands" (Baruch Levy, Letter to Karl Marx, 'La Revue de Paris,' p. 574, June 1, 1928).
Together with Brother Gilad we see this happening before our very eyes. Though they imagine themselves the phoenix god of the new holocaust religion, they are no gods and will bring destruction upon themselves and the consummation of life as foretold by the prophets of Israel.
This Newsletter serves those of like precious faith. Whoever will receive the truth is welcome to feed their soul from the waters of the River of Life. Everything here presented should be confirmed personally in your own Bible.
Your brother-in-Christ, Anthony Grigor-Scott
Overview of Obama so Far
March 17, 2009 The Obama administration is primarily on a mission to consolidate the greatly increased control over the economy which the Rothschild/Rockefeller allied Banksters began circa September 27, 2008. . . on that day their 5 Big TV Networks and national wire services began crying that "the sky is falling"give us a Trillion $$ dollarsor we will shut down the nation. (They didn't say it quite this bluntly, but they said it). These Banksters are in a position to do this because our Congress unconstitutionally delegated to their grandfathers the power to issue all money for the USA on December 23, 1913. They have been working and trying to consolidate more and more control over the population ever since. . .
Incredibly, if you see through the smoke and mirrors, they were DEMANDING this money because they had just stolen money, pensions, and 401K's from millions of hard working Americans! Bernie Made-Off is taking the fall in the media, but he is one of them, and the Banksters appreciate the 50 billion dollars he stole from normal people. (Made-OFF will probably be spirited out of jail to live incognito in Israel or Switzerlandonly brought back once a year for his "Parole hearing". . .)
According to news stories in the MAINSTREAM PRESSthe Fed or the US Government now holds 82% of the home mortgages in the USA! . . . the Federal Government was now in the process of buying up CONSUMER DEBT. This is socialism; this is a giant leap towards Communism, brought to us by the same crowd that brought the world the bloody Communist Revolution in 1917now firmly ensconced in control of almost every lever of Power in New York City and Washington D.C.
This is the greatest FINANCIAL LEAP forward by the Federal Reserve Board and those behind this privately held central banksince the Great Depression of 1929. . . Full story: lists.topica.com. Who is Bernard Madoff, the man behind the $50 billion fraud? Talk About A Double Scam Poor Bernie Madoff.
Comment: The 'City of London' has America and her other colonies snared in her monetary trap, short on credit and long on debt. Their productive industry has been relocated off-shore on the hoax of globalization and the unpatriotic greed of entrepreneurs duped by the lure of cheap labour and potential new markets in the Third World, ignoring that known fact massive depopulation and a return to serfdom is the plan of the 'hidden hand.' Public utilities have been privatized and private debts socialized to the tune of trillions. International banksters have spirited away national gold reserves for the IMF to fill the bottomless pot of Third World indebtedness intentionally created by banksters who harvest interest on credit created out of thin air. Gold not sold by myopic fools in government has been leased to borrowers in the carry trade and sold at such low prices that they will never be able to afford to repurchase the bullion and restore it to the central banks. Meanwhile shady operators are, by hook and by crook, stealing and/or removing billions offshore where they can exchange their billions for hard assets before the currency crash renders it worthless. Somebody has been manipulating the price of gold downward and quietly buying in preparation for the collapse of the US dollar. What they do not know is that this will take place in an instant at the sinking of Los Angeles. Then the fiat money of other nations, backed by no more than psychology, will likewise collapse, and as prophesied by Daniel, Jesus and Brother Branham, Rome and Rothschilds will refinance the US dollar, and rule the world.
New Bill will extend Sunset Clauses of the Patriot Act
March 16, 2009 The criminal terrorists in the federal government are seeking now to extend sunset clauses found in the USA Patriot Act and the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Act of 2004. This will effectively extend certain provisions of this bill that were set to expire from 2009 to 2019. Both the USA Patriot Act and the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Act of 2004 were widely panned upon their passage for undermining civil liberties and unnecessarily expanding government power. . . Full story: roguegovernment.com
Prosecute a Real War on Drugs, or get out of Afghanistan
March 18, 2009 "In 2001, the year that the US invaded Afghanistan to oust the ultra orthodox Islamic Taliban which harboured the infamous terrorist group al-Qaeda, Afghanistan produced less than 100 tons of opium. In 2007, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Afghanistan's opium production was 8,240 tons! . . . an increase of 80 times . . . "This opium, converted to heroin, generates about US$4 billion to those Afghans who control the drug business and related crime, while the street value in Europe of that heroin is US$132 billion". . . the five southern provinces of Afghanistan: Helmand, Nimroz, Farah, Uruzgan and Kandahar produce 80% of the country's opium, but are patrolled by more than 8,300 British troops in collaboration with a few thousand Canadian and Australian troops.
"What is going on that since 2001 the opium production has skyrocketed, particularly in these British, Australian and Canadian areas?". . . January this year, UNODC director Antonio Costa reported that the world drug trade is so big that it could be considered the most important of all world agricultural markets worth over US$320 billion, and a large proportion of this money is being channeled into the banking systems of Europe. . . Full story: cecaust.com.au
Dispossessed Dentist paints Anti-Bank Slogans on Property
March 17, 2009 Declaring "banks are thieves" and the judges supporting them "traitors," John Wilson has turned his repossessed North Rocks property into a giant billboard. The dentist, deregistered, and with no surgery to work from, could be jailed for public mischief over his fight against the banks. "People should know what's happening and how banks are illegally repossessing homes," [D]r. Wilson said. The North Rocks Road property was once [D]r. Wilson's dental surgery until he decided his mortgage was unlawful. His reasoning came from the Magna Cartathe English legal charter dating back to 1215. The theory goes that variable interest rates can't be a legally binding contract because contracts must provide "certainty" and, by their nature, "variable" interest rates are anything but certain.
It was January last year and his repayments had gone up from about $2,600 a month to about $4,000 a month. So he stopped making repayments. His bank, not surprisingly, did not concur on his points of law. Mr Wilson was finally forced out on September 9 last year but it was far from the end of the saga. . . "It's a matter of principle," . . .
Full story: news.com.au
Comment: Under our adversarial system case law rules, not truth or principle. Banking on the fact "Jesus saves," Brother Wilson is sacrificing principal for principle, with interest compounding to his account in heaven. Please visit his Website.
Undersea Volcano erupts off Tonga Coast
March 18, 2009 An undersea volcano erupted off the coast of Tonga shooting clouds of smoke, steam and ash thousands of metres into the sky above the South Pacific ocean . . . an area where up to 36 undersea volcanoes are clustered, said Tonga's geological service head, Keleti Mafi. "It's a very significant eruption, on quite a large scale. . ."
Tonga, a 170-island archipelago about halfway between Australia and Tahiti, is part of the Pacific "ring of fire"an arc of earthquake and volcanic zones stretching from Chile in South America through Alaska and down through Vanuatu to Tonga. Full story: news.smh.com.au earthquake.usgs.gov
War on Terror Within: the End of Jewish History
By Gilad Atzmon
copyright © 2009 · All Rights Reserved by Author
The issue I am going to discuss today is probably the most important thing I've ever had to say about Israeli brutality and contemporary Jewish identity. I assume that I could have shaped my thought into a wide-ranging book or an analytical academic text but instead, I will do the very opposite, I will make it as short and as simple as possible.
In the weeks that have just passed we had been witness to an Israeli genocidal campaign against the Palestinian civilian population in Gaza. We had been witnessing one of the strongest armies in the world squashing women, elderly people and children. We saw blizzards of unconventional weapons bursting over schools, hospitals and refugee camps. We had seen and heard about war crimes committed before, but this time, the Israeli transgression was categorically different. It was supported by the total absolute majority of the Israeli Jewish population. The IDF military campaign in Gaza enjoyed the support of 94% of the Israeli population. 94% of the Israelis apparently approved of the air raids against civilians. The Israeli people saw the carnage on their TV screens, they heard the voices, they saw hospitals and refugee camps in flames and yet, they weren't really moved by it all. They didn't do much to stop their "democratically elected" ruthless leaders. Instead, some of them grabbed a seat and settled on the hills overlooking the Gaza Strip to watch their army turning Gaza into modern Hebraic coliseum of blood. Even now when the campaign seems to be over and the scale of the carnage in Gaza has been revealed, the Israelis fail to show any signs of remorse. As if this is not enough, all throughout the war, Jews around the world rallied in support of their "Jews-only state." Such a popular support of outright war crimes is unheard of. Terrorist states do kill, yet they are slightly shy about it all. Stalin's USSR did it in some remote Gulags, Nazi Germany executed its victims in deep forests and behind barbed wire. [This is untrue, the Katyn massacres of Polish officers and the massacres in Latvia were the work of Jewish USSR troops]. In the Jewish state, the Israelis slaughter defenseless women, children and the old in broad daylight, using unconventional weapons targeting schools, hospitals and refugee camps.
This level of group barbarism cries for an explanation. The task ahead can be easily defined as the quest for a realization of Israeli collective brutality. How is it that a society has managed to lose its grip of any sense of compassion and mercy?
The Terror Within
More than anything else, the Israelis and their supportive Jewish communities are terrorized by the brutality they find in themselves. The more ruthless the Israelis are, the more frightened they become. The logic is simple. The more suffering one inflicts on the other, the more anxious one becomes of the possible potential deadly capacity around. In broad terms, the Israeli projects on the Palestinian, Arab, Muslim and Iranian, the aggression which he finds in himself. Considering the fact that Israeli brutality is now proved to be with no limit and with no comparison, their anxiety is as at least as great.
Seemingly, the Israelis are fearful of themselves being the henchmen. They are engaged in a deadly battle with the terror within. But the Israeli is not alone. The Diaspora Jew who rallies in support of a state that pours white phosphorous on civilians is caught in the exact same devastating trap. Being an enthusiastic backer of an overwhelming crime, he is horrified by the thought that the cruelty he happens to find in himself may manifest itself in others. The Diaspora Jew who supports Israel is devastated by the imagined possibility that a brutal intent, similar to his own, may one day turn against him. This very concern is what the fear of anti-Semitism is all about. It is basically the projection of the collective Zio-centric tribal ruthlessness onto others.
There is no Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
What we see here is a clear formation of a vicious cycle in which the Israeli and his supporters are becoming an insular fireball of vengeance that is fueled by some explosive internal aggression. The meaning of it all is pretty revealing. Since Palestinians cannot militarily confront Israeli aggression and destructive capacity, we are entitled to argue that there is no Israeli- Palestinian conflict. All there is is Israeli psychosis in which the Israeli is being shattered with anxiety by the reflection of his own ruthlessness. Being regarded as the Nazis of our time, the Israeli is thus doomed to seeing a Nazi in everyone. Similarly, there is no rise in anti-Semitism either. The Diaspora Zionist Jew is simply devastated by the possibility that someone out there is as ethically corrupted and merciless as he himself proved to be. In short, Israeli politics and Zionist lobbying should be seen as no less than a lethal Zio-centric collective paranoia on the verge of total psychosis.
Is there a way to redeem the Zionist of his bloody expedition? Is there a way to change the course of history, to save the Israelis and their supporters from total depravity? Probably the best way to pose this question is to ask whether there is a way to save the Israeli and the Zionist from themselves. As one may gather, I am not exactly interested in saving Israelis or Zionists; however, I do grasp that redeeming Zionists of their transgression may bring a prospect of peace to Palestine, Iraq and probably the rest of us. For those who fail to see it, Israel is just the tip of the iceberg. At the end of the day, America, Britain and the West are now subject to some similar forms of "politics of fear" that are the direct outcome of Neocon deadly interventionist ideology and practices.
The Shrink from Nazareth
Many years ago, so we are told, there was an Israelite who lived amongst His brethren in the land of Canaan. Like the contemporary Israelis, He was surrounded by hate, vengeance and fear. At a certain stage He had decided to intervene and to bring about a change, He realized that there was no other way to fight ruthlessness than to search for grace. "Turn your other cheek" was His simple suggestion. Identifying the Israelite's psychosis as "a war against terror within," Jesus grasped that the only way to counter violence is to look in the mirror while searching for Goodness within.
It is rather apparent that Jesus' lesson paved the way to the formation of western universal ethics. Modern political ideologies drew their lesson from the Christian prospect. Marx's normative search for equality can be seen as a secular rewriting of Jesus' notion of brotherhood. And yet, not a single political ideology has managed to integrate the deepest notion of Jesus' grace. To seek peace is primarily to search for one within. While Israelis and their Neocon twins would aim at achieving peace by means of deterrence, true peace is achieved by the search for harmony within. As a Laconian scholar may suggest, to love your neighbour is actually to love yourself loving your neighbour. The case of the Israeli is the complete opposite. As they manage to prove time after time, they are really loving themselves hating their neighbours or in short, they simply love themselves hating in general. They hate almost everything: the neighbour, the Arab, Chavez, the German, Islam, the Goy, Pork, the Pope, the Palestinian, the Church, Jesus, Hamas, calamari and Iran. You name it, they hate it. One may have to admit that hating so much must be a very consuming project unless it gives pleasure. And indeed the Israeli "pleasure principle" could be articulated as follows: it continuously drives the Israeli to seek pleasure in hate while inflicting pain upon others.
It must be mentioned at this point that the "War Against Terror within" is not exactly a Jewish invention. Everyone, whether it is nations, peoples or individuals are a potential subject to it. The consequences of American nuclear murderous slaughter in Hiroshima and Nagasaki made the American people into a terrorised collective. This collective anxiety is known as the "cold war." America is yet to redeem itself of the fear that there maybe someone out there as merciless as America proved to be. To a certain extent, operation Shock and Awe had a very similar effect on Britain and America. It led to the creation of horrified masses easily manipulated by highly motivated elite. This exact type of politics is called "politics of fear".
And yet, within the western discourse a correction mechanism is in place. Unlike the Jewish state that is getting radicalised by its own self feeding paranoia, in the West, evil is somehow confronted and contained eventually. The murderer is denounced and hope for peace is somehow reinstated till further notice. Not that I hold my breath for President Obama bringing any change, one thing is rather clear, Obama was voted in to bring a change. Obama is a symbol of our genuine attempt to curtail evil. In the Jewish state, not only does it not happen, it can never happen. The difference between Israel and the West is rather obvious. In the West, Christian heritage is providing us with a possibility of a wish grounded on belief in universal goodness. Though, we are under the constant danger of exposure to evil, we tend to believe that goodness will eventually prevail. On the other hand, in Hebraic tribal discourse, Goodness is the property of the chosen. The Israelis do not see goodness or kindness in their neighbors, they see them as savage and as a life-threatening entity. For the Israelis, kindness is their very own property, accidentally they are also innocent and victims. Within the western universal discourse, goodness doesn't belong to one people or a single nation;, it belongs to all and to none at the same time. Within the Western universal heritage, Goodness is found in each of us. It doesn't belong to a political party or an ideology. The elevating notion of grace and a Good God is there in each of us; it is always very close to home.
What Kind of Father is That?
"Then when the Lord your God brings you to the land He promised your ancestors Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob to give youa land with large, fine cities you did not build, houses filled with choice things you did not accumulate, hewn out cisterns you did not dig, and vineyards and olive groves you did not plantand you eat your fill" (Deuteronomy 6:10-11).
"When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to possess and drives out before you many nations . . . then you must destroy them totally. Make no treaty with them and show them no mercy" (Deuteronomy 7:1-2).
At this point we may try to attempt and to grasp the root cause behind the severe lack of compassion within the Israeli discourse and its supportive lobbies. I believe that an elaboration on the troubled relationships between the Jews and their different gods may throw some light on the topic. It is rather obvious that the ever growing list of Jewish "gods," "Idols" and "Father-figures" is slightly problematic at least as far as ethics and kindness are concerned. The very relationship between "the son" and the "non-ethical father" must be explored. The philosopher Ariella Atzmon (who happens to be my mother) defines the complexity of the false beginning as the "Fagin Syndrome." Charles Dickens' Fagin is a "kidsman," an adult who recruits children and trains them as pickpockets and thieves, exchanging food and shelter for goods the children steal. Though the kids must be grateful towards their master, they must also despise him for turning them into thieves and pickpockets. The kids realise that Fagin's goods are all stolen and his kindness is far from being genuinely honest or pure. Sooner or later the kids will turn against their master Fagin in an attempt to liberate themselves of the immoral catch.
From a father-son perspective, the Biblical Jewish God Jehovah is no different from what we might see in the Fagin syndrome. The father of Israel leads his chosen people through the desert to the promised land so they can rob and plunder its indigenous habitants. This is not exactly what one may expect of an ethical father or a "kind God." Consequently, as much as the sons of Israel love Jehovah, they must also be slightly suspicious of him for turning them into robbers and murderers. They might even be apprehensive regarding his kindness. Thus, it shouldn't take us by a surprise that throughout Jewish history more than just a few Jews had turned against their heavenly father.
However, bearing in mind the common secularist perception that Gods are actually invented by people, one may wonder, what leads to the invention of such an "unethical God"? What makes people follow the rules of such a God? It would also be interesting to find out what kind of alternative gods Jews happened to pick or invent once Jehovah has been shunned.
Since emancipation, more than just a few Jews had been disassociating themselves from the traditional tribal setting and rabbinical Judaism. Many intermingled with their surrounding realities, dropped their chosen entitlement and turned into normal human beings. Many other Jews insisted upon dropping God yet maintaining their racially orientated tribal affiliation. They decided to base their tribal belonging on ethnic, racial, political, cultural and ideological grounds rather than the Judaic precept. Though they noticeably dropped Jehovah they insisted upon adopting a secularist view that was soon shaped into a monolithic religious-like precept. All throughout the 20th century, the two religion-like political ideologies that had been found to be most appealing to the Jewish masses were Marxism and Zionism.
Marxism can be easily portrayed as a secular universal ethical ideology. However, within the process of transformation into a Jewish tribal precept, Marxism has managed to lose any traces of humanism or universalism. As we know, early Zionist ideology and practice was largely dominated by Jewish leftists who regarded themselves as true followers of Marx. They believed that celebrating their Jewish national revival at the expense of Palestinians was a legitimate socialist endeavour.
Interestingly enough, their opponents, the anti-Zionist Bund of the East European Jewish Labour, didn't really believe in the institutional robbery of the Palestinians, instead, they believed that taking from rich Europeans is a great universal mitzvah on the path towards social justice. The following are a few lines from The Bund's anthem:
"We swear our stalwart hate persists,
Of those who rob and kill the poor:
The Tsar, the masters, capitalists,
Our vengeance will be swift and sure.
So swear together to live or die"!
Without engaging in questions having to do with ethics or political affiliation, it is rather obvious that the Jewish Marxist anthem is overwhelmingly saturated with "hate" and "vengeance." As much as Jews were enthusiastic about Marx, Marxism, Bolshevism and equality, the end of the story is known. Jews en masse dropped Marx a long time ago. They somehow left the revolution to some enlightened Goyim such as Hugo Chavez and Evo Morales. Leaders who truly internalised the real meaning of universal equality and ethics.
Though in the late 19th century and the early 20th century, Marxism found many followers amongst European Jews, following the Holocaust, Zionism has gradually become the voice of world Jewry. Like Fagin, the Zionist gods and Idols: Herzl, Ben Gurion, Nordau, Weizmann, promised their followers a new unethical beginning. Robbing the Palestinians was their path towards a long overdue historical justice. Zionism transformed the Old Testament from a spiritual text into a land registry. But again as in the case of Jehovah, the Zio God transformed the Jew into a thief, it promised him someone else's property. This in itself may explain the Israeli resentment towards Zionism and Zionist ideology. Israelis prefer to see themselves as the natural dwellers of the land rather than pioneers in a non-ethical Jewish Diaspora colonial project. The Israeli Jew furnishes his political stand by means of severe ethical escapism. This may explain the fact that as much as the Israelis love their wars, they really hate to fight them. They are not willing to die for a big abstract remote ideology such as the "Jewish nation" or "Zionism." They overwhelmingly prefer to drop white phosphorous and cluster bombs from afar.
However, along the relatively short history of modern Jewish nationalism the Zio God made friends with some other gods and kosher idols. Back in 1917 Lord Balfour promised the Jews that they would erect their national home in Palestine. Needless to say, as in the case of Jehovah, Lord Balfour made the Jews into plunderers and robbers, he came up with an outright non-ethical promise. He promised the Jews someone else's land. This was basically a false beginning. Evidently, it didn't take long before the Jews turned against the British Empire. In 1947 the UN made exactly the same foolish mistake, it gave birth to the "Jews-only State" again at the expense of the Palestinians. It legitimised the robbery of Palestine in the name of the nations. Like in the case of shunned Jehovah, it didn't take long before the Jews turned against the UN. "It doesn't matter what the Goyim say, all that matters is what the Jews do," said Israeli PM David Ben Gurion. Recently Israelis have managed to even shun their best subservient friends in the White House. On the eve of the last American presidential election Israeli Generals had been filmed denouncing President Bush for "damaging Israeli interests for being overwhelmingly supportive" (Ret. Brig General Shlomo Brom). The Israeli Generals basically blamed Bush for not stopping Israel from destroying its neighbours. The moral is rather clear, the Zionists and the Israelis will inevitably turn against their gods, Idols, fathers and others who try to help them. This is the real meaning of the Fagin syndrome within the Israeli political context. They will always have to turn against their fathers.
I believe that the most interesting Jewish belief system of them all is the Holocaust Religion, which the Israeli Philosopher Yeshayahu Leibowitz rightly defined as the "new Jewish religion." The most interesting aspect of the Holocaust religion is its God-figure, namely "the Jew." The Jewish follower of that newly formed dogmatic precept believes in "the Jew", the one who redeemed himself. The one who "survived" the "ultimate genocidal" event. The followers believe in "the Jew," the "innocent" victim sufferer who returned to his "promised land" and now celebrates his successful revival narrative. To a certain extent, within the Holocaust religious discourse, the Jew believes in "the Jew," expressed as his/her powers and his/her eternal qualities. Within the newly formed religious framework, Mecca is Tel Aviv and the Holy Shrine is the Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum. The newly formed religion has many shrines (Museums) scattered around the world and it has many priests who spread the message around and punish its opposing elements. From a Jewish perspective, the Holocaust religion is a fully transparent expression of self love. It is where past and future merge into a meaningful present; it is when history is translated into praxis. Whether consciously or unconsciously, every person who identifies politically and ideologically (rather than religiously) as a Jew is, practically speaking, succumbing to the Holocaust religion and a follower of its father-figure "the Jew." And yet, one may wonder, what about Kindness, is there any goodness in this newly formed 'father-figure'? Is there any grace in this narrative of innocent victimhood that is celebrated daily at the expense of the Palestinian people?
If there is an end to history, the Holocaust religion embodies the very end of Jewish history. In the light of the Holocaust religion the "Father" and the "Son" unite at last. At least in the case of Israel and Zionism they bond into an amalgam of genocidal ideology and reality. In the light of the Holocaust religion and its epic survival ethos the Jewish State considers itself legitimated in dropping white phosphorus on women and children who they have caged in an inescapable open-air prison. Sadly enough, the crimes committed by the Jewish State are done on behalf of the Jewish people and in the name of their troubled history of persecution. The Holocaust religion brings to life what seems to be the ultimate possible form of insular brutal incarnation.
Historically Jews have shunned many gods, they dropped Jehovah, they dumped Marx, some have never followed Zionism. But in the light of the Holocaust religion, while bearing in mind the scenes from Gaza, Jenin and Lebanon, the Jew may have to continue in the tradition and drop "the Jew." He will have to accept that his newly formed father-figure was formed in his own shape. More concerning is the devastating fact that the new father is proved to be a call to kill. Seemingly, the new father is the ultimate evil god of them all.
I wonder how many Jews will be courageous enough to shun their esoteric newly formed father-figure. Will they be courageous enough to join the rest of humanity adopting a universal ethical discourse? Whether the Jew drops "The Jew," only time will tell. Just to remove any doubt, I did drop my "Jew" a long time ago and I am doing fine. nl572.htm
Pass it on . . . please send this article to someone you know
Brother Grigor-Scott is a non-denominational minister who has ministered full-time since 1981, primarily to other ministers and their congregations overseas. He pastors Bible Believers' tiny congregation, and is available to teach in your church.