Bible Believers' Newsletter 694
"We focus on the present Truth – what Jesus is doing now. . ."
Christian greetings in the precious Name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Paul instructed Christians: "Study to present yourself to God as one approved, a workman with no cause to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Message of Truth. Avoid the disputations and godless chatter of a second-hand religion which will lead into further ungodliness" (II Timothy 2:15-16). "Do not stifle the Spirit, do not despise prophesying, but test everything; hold fast to that which is good and abstain from every form of evil" (I Thessalonians 5:19-22).
Remember, "the things that the preacher is liable to teach yer, ain't necessarily so," and if you are so foolish as to have a television set in your home you are feeding on LIES professionally crafted to transform you into an automaton. With these words please welcome contributing author, freelance journalist Jim Stone, who offers compelling evidence the official story regarding the 9.1 Fukushima earthquake is another BIG LIE presented by those behind claims of three mythical holocausts last century, each of six million Jews, and the false flag black ops of 9/11 and 7/7.
Jim's unabridged report is a very, very important signal of the imminent end of the Gentile dispensation. "Study to present yourself to God as one approved, and test everything." Your trusted mainstream media and "honourable" representatives have betrayed you in service to the 'City of London' and Lucifer's totalitarian one world government.
This Newsletter serves those of like precious faith. Whoever will receive the truth is welcome to feed their soul from the waters of the River of Life. Everything here presented should be confirmed personally in your own Bible.
"Chrislam" being adopted by Churches in America
July 3, 2011 On June 26, 2011, churches in 26 states in America invited Islam into their churches. They removed crosses and everything that offends Islam and put the Koran next to the Bible on church pulpits. . . Chrislamstarted in part by Rick Warren of Saddleback Church's embrace Christianity and Islamhas grown dramatically and now has infected many hundreds of churches and denominations all across America. A new group called Faith Shared is now spearheading the move to merge Christianity with Islam, and in the process, will be provoking the very judgment of God down upon us as a nation. . . Full story: nowtheendbegins.com
Comment: Brother Branham said, "America is the prostitute of the nations. That's exactly what she is, and she's going to be worse than ever now. She's coming to her end. The Bible speaks of her doom. . . It's a million miles from being a Christian country. I don't even pray for it." God is not double-minded so whatever it is there is one unchanging faith, and that is the mind of God in you.
Debris, Craters, and Smoke all over America
After condemning the Jews as offspring of the Serpent and tracing them back to Cain our Lord God and Messiah declared: "Your house [not God's House] is left to you desolate. I certify you will not see God again until you welcome Me saying, Blessed is He who comes in the Name of the Lord."
"As He was leaving the Temple grounds, His disciples came forward to show Him the Temple buildings [yet He was God's Temple (Mark 14:58; John 2:18). So] He answered, You see all these things, do you not? Truly I say to you, there will not be one stone left on another, that will not be thrown down" (Matthew 23:33 24:2). This took place on Tuesday afternoon Nisan 11 (April 4), AD30.
They departed and crossed the Kidron Valley. That evening "as He sat upon the Mount of Olives, His disciples came to Him privately, saying, Tell us, (1) when shall these things be? and (2) what will be the sign of your [parousia] Coming, and (3) [the sign] of the end of the world"?
In responding to these questions Jesus outlined the Seven Seals of redemption, described the moral condition of the world at the end of the Gentile dispensation, foretold Brother Branham's ministry calling the wise and foolish virgin out from the world church system to meet the Bridegroom at His 'parousia' Coming as Son of man, declared the parable of the talents, and described the general resurrection and white throne judgment after the millennium and before the renewal of heavens and earth. "When Jesus had finished all these words, He said to His disciples, You know that after two days the Passover will be celebrated and the Son of man will be betrayed to be crucified" (Matthew 24:36 26:2).
Two days later on Thursday Nisan 13 (April 5), AD30 Judas betrayed Messiah who was arrested in Gethsemane following the Last Supper, arraigned before the authorities and crucified on the evening of Friday, Nisan 14. This would be April 6 on our calendar since the Hebrews reckon their days from evening to evening. Two days of a thousand years have passed since the Son of man was crucified and in 2012 Nisan 14 again falls upon the full Moon of April 6. Has the time come for the world to "crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh?"
"God is no respecter of persons," at the end of the Hebrew dispensation He revealed Himself behind the veil of the sinless virgin-born Man by "discerning the thoughts and intents of the heart" (Hebrews 4:12), at the end of our dispensation He has veiled Himself behind a sinner saved by grace, revealing "Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, and today, and forever" by the same sign. It is fitting that this man William Branham should have been born on April 6, the month in which Jesus was born and later crucified by the beast of Imperial Rome in union with the apostate Jewish church. How timely as the US image to the beast of Imperial Rome in union with the non-Semitic, anti-Semitic self-styled Jews, their Judaeo-Roman Catholic church and her once Protestant daughters is provoking innocent Islamic to anarchy, setting the scene for Israel's Seventh Trumpet and the siege of Jerusalem. "The fourth beast is diverse from all the others, exceedingly dreadful, whose teeth of iron and claws of brass devour, break in pieces and trample what remains of a victim under its feet. . . and will devour the whole earth, tread it down, and break it in pieces" (Daniel 7:19, 23).
Following the second crucifixion of the Son of God by the absolute rejection of the fullness of the Word Brother Branham introduced, might the prophesied earthquakes be induced this coming Nisan 14? For considering the prearranged tenuous state of global currencies and the world economy the banksters surely will not jeopardize their advantage by allowing the dispensation to continue another year without intervention?
Brother Branham said, "The Laodicean Age began around the turn of the Twentieth Century, perhaps 1906. How long will it last? As a servant of God who has had multitudes of visions, of which NONE has ever failed, let me predict (I did not say prophesy, but predict) that this age will end around 1977. [Around this time Christ's end-time Bride reached the age of accountability and the revelation of His 'parousia' Coming began to unfold Ed]. If you will pardon a personal note here, I base this prediction on seven major continuous visions that came to me one Sunday morning in June, 1933. The Lord Jesus spoke to me and said that the Coming of the Lord was drawing nigh, but that before He came, seven major events would transpire. I wrote them all down and that morning I gave forth the revelation of the Lord. The first vision was that Mussolini would invade Ethiopia and that nation would "fall at his steps" [Daniel 11:43]. That vision surely did cause some repercussions, and some were very angry when I said it and would not believe it. But it happened that way. He just walked in there with his modern arms and took over. The natives didn't have a chance. But the vision also said that Mussolini would come to a horrible end with his own people turning on him. That came to pass just exactly as it was said.
The next vision foretold that an Austrian by the name of Adolph Hitler would rise up as dictator over Germany, and that he would draw the world into war. It showed the Siegfried line and how our troops would have a terrible time to overcome it. Then it showed that Hitler would come to a mysterious end.
The third vision was in the realm of world politics for it showed me that there would be three great ISMS, Fascism, Nazism, Communism, but that the first two would be swallowed up into the third. The voice admonished, "WATCH RUSSIA, WATCH RUSSIA. Keep your eye on the King of the North."
The fourth vision showed the great advances in science that would come after the Second World War. It was headed up in the vision of a plastic bubble-topped car that was running down beautiful highways under remote control so that people appeared seated in this car without a steering wheel and they were playing some sort of a game to amuse themselves.
The fifth vision had to do with the moral problem of our age, centering mostly around women. God showed me that women began to be out of their place with the granting of the vote. Then they cut off their hair, which signified that they were no longer under the authority of a man but insisted on either equal rights, or in most cases, more than equal rights. She adopted men's clothing and went into a state of undress, until the last picture I saw was a woman naked except for a little fig leaf type apron. With this vision I saw the terrible perversion and moral plight of the whole world.
Then in the sixth vision there arose up in America a most beautiful, but cruel woman. She held the people in her complete power. I believed that this was the rise of the Roman Catholic Church, though I knew it could possibly be a vision of some woman rising in great power in America due to a popular vote by women.
The last and seventh vision was wherein I heard a most terrible explosion. As I turned to look I saw nothing but debris, craters, and smoke all over the land of America" (An Exposition of the Seven Church Ages, p. 321:2 322:3).
World Wars I, II and III like the sinking of the Lusitania, Pearl Harbour, 9/11, 7/7, the Madrid, Bali and numerous bombings including Fukushima, and the annihilation of the North American continent as the Lord showed Brother Branham in the last of seven consecutive visions, was planned long, long ago by the 'hidden hand.' The same 'hidden hand' that destroyed the Greek, Roman, Spanish, French and German empires, conquered England (which it has ruled from behind the scenes since 1689), Russia (which it has ruled since 1917), and the united States of America which it has always ruled.
Just as they kept technology out of the public domain that would allow cars to travel 75 kilometers on a litre of gas, the banksters outlawed and 'buried' technology that would enable nuclear fuel to be reused twenty times until the "nuclear loop" is closed. And when that is finished the fuel is DEAD and no longer hazardous because all of its radioactive potential has been used up. It was a dream come true, and President Carter banned it by executive order! The burn down was so complete, spent fuel would be safe to handle with your bare hands, and require no special care or maintenance . . .
"You have been told the nuclear waste must go somewhere. You have been told it needed to be stored inside a mountain in the desert, where it will sit as a threat and menace the world for millions of years. You have been told there is nothing we can do about it. What if you have been told a lie? What if that "spent fuel" was not spent at all? What if a technology existed which allowed the same fuel to be used over and over, twenty times in fact, and expended so fully that fuel rods would be safe enough to handle straight out of the reactor? . ."
"He then went on to lament what a waste of money it was, because the fuel is expensive and they were only using about five percent of its potential. He lamented the fact his life's greatest accomplishment was banned for no good reason, and it was a tremendous waste of money to not use the technology his team developed. Electricity would have been cheap. REAL CHEAP. So cheap that homes would not have been heated with oil or natural gaselectricity would have been the only sensible choice. Furthermore, with a reduction in the price of electricity by at least 10X, electric cars would have been a no brainer."
"This would have been America's free energy future, with the only real cost being maintenance of infrastructure."
"His take on it was that we were now paying too much for electricity. I guess that's how an engineer thinks. He had read my article on Fukushima and liked it, so one would guess his eyes were open to the global conspiracy. Even still I think he missed the obvious."
"Here is my take, and it has NOTHING to do with price, preservation of resources, or free energy."
"Nuclear reactors are HUGE. They contain enormous amount of nuclear material. One boiling water reactor core the size of those at Fukushima can easily hold enough fissionable material to make countless atomic bombs. And with the technology that makes re-using that fuel illegal, it builds up at a rate of 25 tons per gigawatt YEAR. This means even small facilities like Fort Calhoun have approximately a million pounds of highly radioactive "poisoned" fuel sitting in their pools waiting for the right combination of problems to cause a disaster."
"The "Federal government" is BUSTED!! for forcing the American nuclear industry to become a ticking time bomb."
Could this be associated with Lucifer's plans for one totalitarian world government, and the annihilation of America once the utility of the United States has been exhausted as prophesied in Daniel 9:27, Revelation 17-18, and the last of seven consecutive visions the Lord showed Brother Branham? I believe your 'gift of suspicion' will be further stimulated as you read the following submission by our guest contributor, James Stone.
Did the Dimona Dozen murder the Fukushima 50?
By James Stone
Fukushima may in fact have been caused by an act of war under cover of an environmental disaster. It took them three hundred years and trillions of dollars to build a theatre of darkness, yet the light of only one match can burn it down. Do not let this light go out.
This is a massive report. If you have troubles understanding it, just look at THIS picture of the vanished reactor, THIS picture of the destroyed facility, and THIS picture, of Magna BSP's camera. Then scroll down to the photos of the NON EXISTENT quake damage and seismic charts which prove there was no 9.0 and therefore the very real tsunami could not have been natural. The fact that what happened in Japan did not occur naturally has been very well documented by a skilled investigator, who spent hundreds of hours getting to the bottom of this story.
Japan offered to enrich uranium for IRAN!: Ynet news. . . Inside Japan News Network. . . The New American. . . Rianovosti news. . . Hindustan Times. . . Zee News, AND FOUR MONTHS LATER, THE DIMONA DOZEN SHOWED UP WITH A REALLY FANCY CAMERA!!
This report uses classified leaked high resolution photos of the destruction of Fukushima originally posted on Pink Tentacle to support its claims, which are:
1. Reactor 3 is completely missing, which means the press and anyone who has claimed anything about pressures, temperatures, containment, etc., for reactor 3 after March 14 are lying and people need to pay attention to it, because failure of the public to realize the magnitude of the lies regarding this situation will leave the door open to a repeat event.
2. Reactor 4 is [WTC] Building 7, demolished by explosives. Reactor 4 had been defueled and was undergoing replacement of it's internal stainless steel shroud, yet blew it's containment anyway. That is the FINAL smoking gun, an empty reactor is inert, and cannot produce an explosion, yet one happened at 4 that was so powerful it destroyed the structure leaving it in danger of falling over. Overheated open fuel pools cannot produce hydrogen because in an open fuel pool the water boils off at 100 Celsius, and won't be present in pressurized form at 2,000 degrees Celsius to liberate it's hydrogen by losing it's oxygen to the zircon cladding in the fuel rods. The rods will prefer the free oxygen in the air and burn long before attempting to claim the oxygen in whatever humidity there might be. Because fuel rods only contain 20 percent fissionable material, they also cannot produce the "prompt criticality" described by "the most qualified nuclear engineer in the world," Arnie Gundersen. I got to the bottom of the Arnie Gundersen story, and added the results of that investigation further down the page. He has been put on a pedestal and pumped up enormously by a press that wants a misleading story, all the while he is a despised outcast of the greater engineering community. The explosion at #4 was flatly impossible absent the use of an explosive device, and as a result the disaster at Fukushima is FAR FAR WORSE than ANYTHING Gundersen is willing to expose. Gundersen is toeing the line and hiding the true magnitude of what happened there because if it became widely known serious questions would be asked. When have you heard Gundersen talk about a totally missing reactor?
Reactor 4's dome was removed for defueling. Drone photos prove it. This dispels the rumors surrounding unit 4's explosion. Some have said this reactor was secretly in operation to enrich plutonium. This photo proves it was disassembled for shroud replacement as stated. Tepco is going out of it's way trying to explain the explosions, especially at reactor 4, because they did indeed occur, so an explanation is needed. As a result, they are giving reasons that cannot happen, just to say something. They need to see this post and get the Arava perspective (Arava is a district surrounding Dimona).
3. That the destruction of the facility is so severe it could only have been accomplished with nuclear weapons. Hydrogen produces a non-ideal subsonic explosion. It cannot turn concrete into dust. It can produce high pressures if sealed off, but the metal roof on all the reactor containments should have provided the relief and been the only thing destroyed. It takes a high intensity explosive to strip concrete off rebar, a blast wave many times faster than supersonic. This means that whatever happened at Fukushima did not have blast characteristics that fit the "official" story. If you missed it in the high resolution photo of the destroyed facility, I took a car that was laying around in the remains and placed it on top of one of the blown away walls at reactor 3, which clearly gives the reference that the walls had support columns at least 15 feet thick. Fukushima was built with the Mark 1 containment design, but beyond Mark 1 standards which was a common upgrade (reference the included photos, it is obvious). It is true that gas explosions can be very destructive, but only in facilities that were not designed to handle them. Even the basic mark 1 containment was many times beyond capable of withstanding the worst hydrogen blast.
4. That nuclear weapon(s) were placed inside of the reactor containment(s) disguised as security cameras installed under contract this year by Arava based security firm Magna BSP (Arava is a district around Dimona, not a city). Their "security cameras" weighed over 1,000 pounds and were the size and shape of gun type nuclear weapons. The reason Magna BSP gave for the odd shape, enormous weight, and giant proportions of their cameras was that they were stereoscopic. They have creatively called them bi-scopic so when you search on Google their monstrous cameras are the only thing that comes up (outside of DJ lighting and a gun scope) Try it. Type "Biscopic camera" into Google images, (without the quotes) it's a hoot! This helps marketing I guess. The need for such a large stereoscopic camera could be plausible at an airstrip, where the camera would need depth perception out miles, but not indoors where focal lengths are short. Other manufacturers have units appropriate for indoor focal lengths which are only twice the size of ordinary monocular security cameras. Depth perception going out miles could also be accomplished with two separately mounted cameras weighing only a few pounds; the giant thousand pounder is a dead giveaway. Magna does make passive radar systems which require a large body, but the owl could accomplish it's claimed function with two small lightweight cameras (5 or so lbs, not tiny) and the processor in a modern laptop. Why this giant thing? notea not yet produced graphical model is what you see most on Google, the ones produced thus far are ugly boxes.
. . . . . . . . . . 9/11, 4/11, 3/11? see a pattern? Let's not see a 6/11. Your time and effort in spreading the word may really make a difference.
The quake was not what we were told
In fact the quake was a bold faced lie packing a political agenda. There is even more proof now, and it goes beyond the linked Japanese chart. This original seismic data is the smoking gun, however, I have something better. I analyzed the lies told by the USGS from which I wrote this sad, sad story about how it really was, not what you will see in the video. Keep in mind that precise top speeds of flying debris cannot be determined with accuracy, but this story will at least be close to the numbers put out by the USGS.
The people in the newsroom did not die, this story is what would have happened were USGS charts true.
Meet Atsuo, Airi, and Akiyoshi. They were all the best and most dedicated people at the NHK newsroom, in Sendai Japan. Akiyoshi loved Airi, and Atsuo was the one who introduced them. Unfortunately, all 3 died in the quake. Akiyoshi got a severe cut and bled to death when he hit a display screen behind him at 44 miles an hour, and was then thrown out through a hole in a collapsed wall. Airi followed pretty much the same path, and died beside him in the rubble. Atsuo flew through the open door behind him, then crashed through a window and was crushed when he landed in a massive seismic crack in the road, which closed in on him. Others in the newsroom died also, (at least according to the official USGS charts) but I never thought up names for them. The laser printer was never found, but the table it was on ended up on top of the rubble, smashed to pieces, where one of the few survivors used a piece of the metal frame to splint his broken leg.
The video below is the one I pulled the frames out of for the sad, sad story. It is a video of a newsroom at the hardest hit area in Japan, and it SAYS IT ALL. This is when the quake was happening live. Staff are alarmed by the earthquake, but most remain seated at their desk. Some even continue typing on their computers as the quake happens.
Also, note that most of the stuff stays on the desks, at the end, a laser printer is still sitting on a cheap table, etc., some things fall but things return to normal quickly, all the while the English announcer is reading a script of devastation with all the pep of some paid fool who does not believe what he is saying in a cheezy infomercial. The quake was significant, but only in a 6.0 sense, as recorded by the seismographs. This is important footage, because it proves the earthquake measured at a 6.8 was an instrumentation-based Richter reading. Confusion between the Shindo and Richter scale is being used to cover this up. I chose this video because its location is documented to have been the worst affected, and was recorded in a newsroom with a known fixed location.
This video is proof of what really went on. This means there never were significant aftershocks, never was a natural tsunami, and if they lied about that, what else? This video is pivotal and vital to exposing the truth. Sure there was a quake, but at this newsroom it was not much over a six if it even was a six. I chose this video because the newsroom is within eyeshot of station MYG012, which was used by the USGS to make these graphs which represent an 8.8, as was stated in this (English) newscast and was probably used as a guide to fudge the lie due to the closeness of the newsroom to the seismic station. Looking at these charts, it is super easy to get a rough guess at how fast people would have flown. 44MPH to the North, and 28MPH to the East. Those are not precise numbers but the charts are proven wrong by the video because according to the charts people should have entered uncontrolled flight. Here is the full chart put out by the USGS. Of course, they offer no reading from MYG011, which was closest to the 9.0 "epicenter" by a long shot, because it only got a 5.63's worth of shaking. I will do that work for them. That map is below.
I challenge ANYONE to send me pictures of this quake showing me devastation in an area not hit by the tsunami. All we have, all the pictures are tsunami damage. Let's see pictures of quake damage. The Kobe quake was a 6.9/7.2 depending on source. That makes this quake, at a 9.0 100X as powerful. Sendai was near the epicenter and would have been devastated if it really happened. Look at the earthquake photos of damage from the Kobe quake and try to find ONE THING SIMILAR in SENDAI. Just try. They do not exist. Outside of the tsunami, the quake which supposedly hit Sendai with many times the power of the one in Kobe, did not destroy a single building. Sendai was only 48 miles from the epicenter of this "9.0" which would have devastated everything in an area 1,000 miles across if it was real. All of Japan would be toast. Try to find a photo of seismic damage in Sendai. I challenge you. Try to find it in any of the coastal cities, as little as 25 miles from the "epicenter." I looked for 5 hours, and except for some tanks that fell at a brewery none exists. No pictures of collapsed skyscrapers or high rises = NO 9.0. You will not find a single skyscraper photo with broken windows eitherno downed power poles, no overturned cars, no uprooted trees, no derailed trains (except for one hit by the tsunami), and the road damage is typical of even a 5.0. You will not find pictures of a single damaged multi-story building or even a structurally damaged timber-framed house outside the tsunami zone. In Sendai the quake messed up grocery stores and kitchens and that is about it.
And now, I will say it like I knew it had to be:
I believe the phony 9.0 story was used as seismic cover for a tsunami nuke, which produced the tsunami of a 9.0 when detonated in the Japan Trench (where no earthquakes of significance happen) as punishment for Japan offering to enrich uranium for Iran. The rest of the story, the concealment, is black ops. Bet on it. In the tsunami videos, the tsunami rips through pristine and undamaged cities, where it is "business as usual," and the tsunami is an ambush; not 9.0 earthquake ravaged debris. The quake is a paper thin story taped together by the undeserved trust of a gullible public. And the stories? The CIA did not hire a million people last year for nothing. If there is evidence of a 9.0 SHOW ME. A 9.0 will devastate an area over 1,000 miles across. That is how big a 9.0 is. The entire nation should be in ruins, especially judging from the damage caused by the 6.9 Kobe quake, and nowhere, nowhere in the entire country outside the tsunami zone is there a single damaged multi-story building, one collapsed bridge, a single structurally damaged timber-framed house, or skyscraper. If a picture exists that can be definitively pinned to this quake, show me. The only collapsed structure in all of Japan was an old welfare shelter near station MYG004, the true epicenter.
Examine these frame captures, and questionwhy no one is trying to run? Why were all the cars parked normally as the tsunami arrived? Why was there no warning? Why did the tsunami sirens only go off after the tsunami arrived? Could it be that the people and the government had not felt a significant earthquake and did not measure one either?
Question: Why are none of the roads packed with people trying to flee the approaching tsunami? Could it be that the people and government were not expecting one? Tsunami sirens blare only when it arrives, rather than 40 minutes before, which is how much warning they would have had if a real quake in the ocean had been detected. Consider that. Parking lots full of cars, everyone at work, no one trying to leave. AMBUSH!!.
People cannot continue typing on their keyboards during a severe quake, it's obviously we were told a lie.
RUSH UPDATE, May 28, 2011
When reviewing the seismic data for the supposed 9.0 I saw there were instead three small simultaneous inland epicenters. This made me suspicious right from the start that the quake was artificially triggered and used as seismic cover for a tsunami bomb. But I needed to find a motive for generating an artificial quake. I suspected that either Japan was testing nukes and Israeli intelligence was onto it and used the tests as the "start of clock" for their operation, or Israel managed to smuggle nukes into lava tubes and tunnels far underground to trigger earthquakes and contain the blasts. So I wanted to find tunnels and lava tubes near each of the three epicenters before writing this possibility into my report. As it turns out, I did not need to. This military briefing with Secretary of Defense William Cohen, dated all the way back to 1997! shows that even then, Cohen knew that EM weaponry could trigger earthquakes and set off volcanoes. I have ignored everything regarding this subject, I thought it was the realm of kooks. I thought EM weaponry would only be effective in weather modification, but I am not going to argue with the Secretary of Defense. There are obviously, energy technologies which have never been publicized, such weaponry would need far more energy input than the electrical grid could provide. And the systems Cohen spoke of in 1997 would now be updated.
Mr. Cohen said: "Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that's why this is so important (April 28, 1997). Left unsaid by William Cohen is that such systems would be developed by DARPA and owned by America first!
I would expect that after fourteen years of further development this technology can now trigger devastating earthquakes in non-seismic zones. Benjamin Fulford, an experienced journalist with a long history and a paid access site, is predicting that the floods along the Mississippi are in fact caused by Haarp, which will then be followed by a manmade earthquake along the New Madrid fault, and then a subsequent attack at 15 reactors in the nation's agricultural heartland. If this is so, it will make Fukushima look like a cake walk. I have personally verified that control systems at most American nuclear facilities (targets) have been upgraded with the Siemens SCADA system susceptible to the Stuxnet virus. It is therefore important for people to SPREAD THE WORD. They have already started with the flooding, which is phase 1. Phase 2 will be the earthquake, destroying levees to unleash the raging Mississippi. Phase 3 will be a Stuxnet virus attack at nuclear facilities. THE ELITE ARE COWARDS. IF THE WORD IS SPREAD SUFFICIENTLY, THEY WILL NOT DARE TO PROCEED TO PHASE 2 AND 3. Mold grows best in the dark.
The following picture is the strongest reading for this quake on any seismogram anywhere in Japan. This was before the lie machine got running smoothly. Early on there were a few sputters and this REAL chart got out. As you can see, it was a 6.67 on the Richter scale, (not Shindo scale, confirmed by PGA reference). This explains why there was NO structural damage in Sendai and the low level of shaking in the video.
This quake was initially assessed a 6.8, and the seismic data will show anyone the epicenter was inland, not at sea. So it started a 6.8, was upgraded to a 7.9, then upgraded to an 8.4, upgraded again to an 8.8, then upgraded to a 9.0, with the epicenter relocated in the ocean. Now many are saying it was a 9.1 which would bump up MYG011's number to 1200 from 1070, and this is all based on the impact of the tsunami, not on seismic data.
The following seismograms clearly show epicenters from three separate small simultaneous quakes as would be expected from an attack, rather than a natural occurrence.
It is difficult for people to grasp the magnitude of a 9.0 because the vast amount of energy being released is hidden behind confusing gradient markings on exponential charts. In order to provide clarity, I have drawn a chart that illustrates the intensity a 9.0 earthquake on a linear scale. Be sure to magnify and scroll the diagram, which is 5,000 pixels high. Owing to its extended vertical height it opens on the left side of the screen and is almost invisible until you zoom the display in your browser. Public incomprehension of the GIANT magnitude of a 9.0 has enabled the elite scammers to propagate this latest BIG LIE. There is simply no way much of anything, even mountains, can remain standing under the impact of a 9.0, yet as the tsunami rolls in we see a picture of serene normalcy.
And now, I will bite. This is what I did not want to publish, but I know it has to be true. Call this creative journalism, because I never called Netanyahu, but here is the most rational conclusion I can draw, based on all info gathered so far including the original authentic (not faked) seismic data.
I honestly believe Japan is being held a nuclear hostage. It all makes sense.
1. Japan offers to enrich uranium for Israel's GREAT SATAN, Iran!
2. Immediately, Israel sets up front companies masquerading as security companies, one of which wins a contract with a Japanese nuclear facility. Four months later the Dimona Dozen show up, and under the cover of the security contract gain unlimited access to the heart of Fukushima. They plant the virus, install real cameras outside the facility, and functional poorly disguised nuke cameras inside the facility. In addition they install an unauthorized data connection to allow control of all the guts of the facility via the virus. (They have admitted to this connection, as discussed later on this page).
3. After installing Stuxnet and the nukes they scram.
4. Israel waits for one of the many natural quakes in Japan to provide cover for a tsunami bomb, at the bottom of the Japan Trench. VLF communications are established with the bomb to penetrate the water. David in Dimona gets seismic reading from Japan. 6.67 in progress, BOOM. (New evidence shows the quake most likely was not natural).
The tsunami comes in, swamps Stuxnet infected power plant, direct video feed from legitimate cameras security company installed gets to David via totally unauthorized channel, and David knows just when to cut the generators off. Others on the team do all they can to counteract measures taken by the employees at Fukushima, who are unaware an attack is taking place and do not understand why everything is going crazy.
5. Israeli Prime Minister calls Japan, and says TAKE THAT for offering help to Iran, and ya know, there are FIVE MORE NUKES in the ocean off the coast of Japan, and we are going to set those off and destroy your coastal cities if you do not forget that 6.67, and say it was a 9 to cover for tsunami effects. AND NOW we are going to make your people DEMAND you move away from nuclear power so you can NEVER threaten us like that again. We are BLOWING UP FUKUSHIMA DIIACHI and you are going to go along with whatever story we tell you to. SO THERE!!
6. David and his pals close ALL valves to the reactors via the remote data link they admitted to installing, and put them full throttle, to melt them down while the virus keeps control room readouts displaying false info, like nothing is going on even though the place is coming apart. After enough mayhem ensues to provide plausibility, they set off planted nukes and blow the place sky high.
And even if the quake was real, there are nukes that can reach an 8.4. Close enough. Though I have yet to work out the final details, I probably have enough to hang them because:
1. I have the real seismic data that proves beyond a doubt the quake is not what we were told and was in fact an inland 6.8, (calculated higher than the seismogram due to the triangulated true epicenter being a little higher), which would be noticed but not feared in quake-ridden Japan.
2. Numerous referenced sources prove Stuxnet was written by Israel.
3. Japan really did offer to enrich Uranium for Iran, and Israel has been documented to have attempted to destroy the reactor in Iran, and probably did. Japan contributing to Iran's nuclear future would make them just as much an enemy to Israel as Iran. Israel would want them taken out.
4. It is documented that a team from Israel with a work history in Israeli defense obtained unlimited access to a Japanese nuclear facility, which then went boom.
5. Reactor 4 had been defueled and proven disassembled, and therefore no explosion there was possible. What should have happened at reactor 4, if anything at all? The fuel pools should have melted down and caught fire once the water boiled off from lack of recirculation AT Worst, and badly contaminated the containment structure, NOTHING ELSE. NO explosions, NOTHING ELSE. Reactor 4 is [WTC] Building 7, PERIOD. Why did an explosion occur that was so severe it blew the (4 feet thick) outer containment walls and inner containment walls that were much thicker? Reactor 4 is reportedly now in danger of falling over. HOW?
6. The Japanese government is going along with the story of a scientifically proven false 9.0. There is a reason, and my guess is that Israel has made threats to wipe out Japanese coastal cities with additional tsunamis if the government of Japan speaks a word of what went on; there should be no reason for Japan to go along with this other than a continued threat.
Is it not interesting this "quake" reportedly happened at the bottom of the Japan trench, which would be perfect for hiding an atomic bomb blast?
Is the Department of Homeland Security trying to keep American industries (and nuclear facilities) in the dark about Stuxnet? After Fukushima fell victim to unwary operators, I should think such a conference would be a TOP priority here in the US! The genie is out of the bottle. It is a fact the writers of Stuxnet intend to use it. So canceling a well-researched conference about the vulnerabilities of the Siemens SCADA system to Stuxnet in the name of "keeping hackers from getting info" seems to me like an effort to keep the threat alive. Ignore the fluff at the beginning, and read the "About TakeDownCon" summary near the bottom so you know what they actually canceled rather than settle for the no-panic fluff at the beginning. This is SERIOUS. I fear that by the time the Hacker Halted conference happens in October, the summer of disaster may have passed. And if it has not, I bet any discussion of Stuxnet at Hacker Halted will also be canceled. Stuxnet is too good a toy for a very powerful group to let go. Something is fishy here.
Other publications have picked up this story, and are poo pooing the issue into the ground. They are obviously attempting to morph responsibility for Stuxnet style attacks away from Israel so that they can regain cover and use the weapon as a false flag tool to destroy internet freedom. This is where they are going to go with thiscount on it, and when the disasters happen there will be a cozy blanket of lies shielding Israel from all blame. Never forget, THIS IS THEIR BABY, NEVER FORGET. Prior to them doing this, WE NEVER HEARD OF IT.
About "prompt criticality"as it turns out, Arnie Gundersen, mister "prompt criticality" with regard to the massive explosion at #3 is very poorly credentialed. His crowning achievement was playing with a 100 watt open water tank reactor in a classroom for a short period of time.
Fuel rods are only 20 percent fissionable, sometimes even less, and until you reach over 90 percent purity in U238 and about 70 percent purity in Plutonium NO "prompt criticality" is possible in ANY case no matter how much you have laying around. Furthermore, even with 100 percent pure material you need a precision trigger slamming or crushing material together to get a detonation. Even if 100 percent pure material is slammed together at high speed, if it is not done right you will get only a nuclear "sputter" that pushes the pieces apart, and no detonation. Nukes are hard to do! Why have so many of us seemed to have forgotten that nuclear detonations are hard to accomplish? The "prompt criticality" in spent fuel story is something I would have expected to hear from an Ewok praying to a gold robot. I can't believe even a scammer would have the guts to suggest it, let alone allow it to be spread around in his name. For an explanation for the explosions, just look at the cameras the Dimona Dozen brought in. If someone is waving a degree as an anchor for this "prompt criticality" bull hockey, remember that there is such a thing as a paper trained idiot and if you look into Gundersen's background you will discover he is barely that, with his ONLY hands-on experience outside a classroom being an intern at a nuclear facility two years before he got his degree!
If the mainstream media wanted the facts, why did they pick this guy? Because he said what they wanted, truth be damned.
"We at Vermont Yankee are well acquainted with Arnie and his exaggerations. He plays to a public and a legislature that has zero knowledge of nuclear power or engineering and is willing to accept any negative claim as truth." And since he gave an impossible "prompt criticality" explanation which diverted attention away from the only real explanation for the magnitude of the explosion at #3a nuke, they gave him a ton of air. Enough said.
This post has been greatly improved via input from readers. If you have information disproving any points, feel something should be clarified or have new info that can further solidify the case, please contact me. Thanks!
The Plain Truth on Fukushima
Fukushima was impossible. The swamping of the external generators by the tsunami was irrelevant, because the real emergency backup systems are driven by steam from the reactors themselves. No electricity is needed to operate three separate emergency systems at each reactor, each of which will keep a reactor safe even if only one works. Interesting it is that all nine non-electrical backup systems across the three fueled reactors failed. This is technically impossible outside of willful intent, and was likely the result of a Stuxnet attack.
Stuxnet was designed specifically to target Siemens SCADA controllers and is most effective at tampering with fluid control systems. The centrifuges it attacked in Iran were ideal. So are the fluid control systems at a nuclear facility. Oil refineries are equally at risk, Stuxnet is most dangerous when affecting a system which needs to control the flow of any liquid, be it hydraulic, for cooling, or combining chemicals. Stuxnet is documented to have been produced by the Israeli Defense Forces, for the purpose of destroying any industrial system that can be destroyed by improper fluid flow.
Magna BSP, a Dimona based company with no history outside of IDF contracts prior to Fukushima has a suspiciously short domain history despite a proclaimed 10 year history. Magna BSP had a full time internet linked two way connection to the Fukushima reactor room(s) all the way through the disaster. They told TEPCO about that connection on March 15 (after everything blew sky high) via an article printed in the Jerusalem Post. Why did Magna BSP wait until everything was blown sky high before telling Tepco the data link existed, then not tell them face to face? I find it hard to believe that TEPCO would not have been interested in viewing a reactor that was about to explode. It seems impossible that Tepco would not have wanted to view the reactor, and probably did not ask because the link was kept a secret. It is a simple fact that internet connections are never allowed inside a reactor's containment. The connection was mentioned in the Jerusalem Post AFTER the destruction was finalized.
Stuxnet has two modes, random and administrative. It can be administered to optimize the damage and can also transmit setup information and industrial system information to a remote computer. Once installed on the host system via a flash drive it causes that system to violate it's normal security protocols and internet administration becomes possible if a connection exists. Tampering is not visible on the control room readouts, because Stuxnet learns what "normal" looks like and keeps the temperature, pressure, and other readouts within normal limits so that the operators are oblivious to the destruction happening in secret. Stuxnet appeared in Japan in June of 2010, shortly after Magna BSP arrived. Remote administration mode can be adjusted on demand to suit any need. No doubt the people at Fukushima sat there in idle mode thinking all was well until something screamed or went boom and at that point it would be too late to do anything other than cry.
I am a lifer in the types of control systems Fukushima and its TVA-owned Browns Ferry clone, have. BOTH have been upgraded to modern Siemens controllers running the Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) system Stuxnet was designed to attack; upgrades are the norm in any major facility. On many blogs people say the controls were old and therefore Stuxnet immune; they are out of touch or have no knowledge of industrial control systems. I actually ferreted it out.
And now I will explain in detail why the problems before the explosions had to be sabotage.
The diesel generators were not out in the open as we were led to believe, they were in fact located in the basements of the turbine buildings which were sealed off and never significantly flooded. One of them stayed running the entire time, but the electrical switch gear attached to it disconnected it for an unexplained reason which made it useless. Each of the backup generators at Fukushima were capable of running 14,000 households, which means they each had to be over ten megawatts. It is obvious then that Fukushima was set up to survive on only ONE of 13 backup generators, and ONE did keep running. One would be many times larger than needed to run last ditch backup systems at all reactors, but would not keep business as usual. But that is not the real story, which is that even others which were high and dry stopped.
I hypothesize that the ONE generator that kept running was kept as a lone reserve, never hooked up to a SCADA controller. Why did the switch gear disconnect a working generator? That is the type of thing Stuxnet was designed to do. On top of these things, emergency generators arrived on scene within 9 hours, before anything bad happened but were unable to provide power because the switch gear would not let them. This deceptively written report from the World Nuclear Association contains all this information, but it is presented in a way which will cause you to overlook these things if you are not careful while reading it. This report contains accurate information presented in a very misleading way, which will protect the liars who wrote itthey actually did speak the truth here but in a way it would be missed by virtually everyone. Study the facts presented here with the full ramifications of those facts in mind, not their shallow misleading conclusions.
From this report you will learn:
1. The generators were never submergedyou have to connect the dots between them being in a contained area and the tsunami thereby being inaccessible. Some water got into one of the turbine buildings where several were located and flooded the lowest point in that building to a depth of 4 feet, which means that even if the generators were on the floor at the lowest point they likely would not have been swamped because they are too bigthe water would not get past the footings. Perhaps a one megawatt generator would have swamped; certainly not one of the big diesels, which were, according to this report enough to run 14,000 homes each. In addition to this, there were several generators in a second location that never got flooded at all. One of these generators kept running but was not able to get power into the facility because the switchgear prevented it.
2. You have to have watched the robot videos, which clearly show the switch gear that malfunctioned after the tsunami never got wetthere was a non-tsunami reason for the failure. Also look at the high resolution photos referenced below. There is no switch gear for the diesel generators outside the facility; it is all indoors in areas higher than the water got. Remember that there was no emergency when the off-site generators arrived, which means that they could work efficiently to get things up and running. With my experience in this area, Assuming it DID get soaked, a complete replacement of high capacity switch gear should only take an afternoon if done with an emergency attitude. A truck mounted crane or a forklift does all the heavy lifting and the stuff is modular. In every major facility there are spares galore. It is not that hard to make the terminations. A worst case scenario could have been addressed before things went horribly awry, that is, unless a virus prevented the new switch gear from activating. It would take days to conclude a virus was messing things up. You would not expect that. I am sure there is a LOT we never heard about.
3. That batteries held, leaving only a one hour gap in time where there was no power present to run things before adequate off site power drove into the facility on the road all nice and ready to hook up, but was denied by switch gear which this report says was swamped but that is likely an assumption because swamped switchgear could have been replaced even before the batteries died. The fact that the offsite generators were able to be driven into the facility also proves that other lies told about the earthquake in generalemployees leaving only to find cracks in the road so bad they had to walk home; Why? Why lie like this? AT LEAST this report has some modicum of honesty.
4. You have to look at the chart that shows the thermal output of the reactors eight hours after the earthquake, which is when the batteries running the electrical cooling pumps died, the output at that time was less than 20 megawatts from each reactor, which means that they would not have had troubles before the off-site generators were hooked up to restore power if it was not denied by what I suspect was Stuxnet-infected switch gear. The real critical time is in the first three hours after shutdown.
5. Reactor 3 exploded entirely, yet this reactor had the most functional backup systems. At least this report says the explosion remains "unexplained." Perhaps those who wrote the report should take a look at this for an answer.
6. The reactors are stated to be an "early 1960's design" apparently to mislead people into believing they were outdated even when installed. This was not the case. Their design was an early 60's concept but in fact a late 60's design, and since installation takes years, what more could you expect in the early 70's? The reactors were in fact a very safe design. This report at least states that the facility was very well updated. Identical reactors at TVA owned Browns Ferry have been certified safe and licensed to operate through the year 2035. These reactors were also converted over to run the Siemens SCADA system. The reactors at Fukushima were not garbage. The fastest cars in production still function on a late 1800's concept.
I hypothesize that the situation at Fukushima is not being properly assessed by facility controllers because Stuxnet is STILL giving false readings to the control panels, readings which obviously have to be false because they show containment pressure when confidential leaked photographs prove beyond a doubt no containment exists AT ALL at reactor 3. There is not even a reactor there.
This report is perfectly inaccurate with regard to reactor 3 containment. Perhaps the people who wrote this report have not actually looked at the facility or seen the confidential photographs.
This report supports what I have said here. It was written by an experienced reactor operator. I found this on May 10. I was absolutely right!
Each reactor has eight separate emergency backup systems, each capable of saving the reactor on its own. Three are designed to function perfectly if all power is lost and even the generators fail. Fukushima did not need any electrical systems operating AT ALL to keep itself from blowing up, when power is lost steam from the reactors is automatically diverted from the generator turbines to two totally separate steam turbines connected to totally separate water pumps needing only reactor steam to power them. Even that backup system has dual redundancy, only one of the two is needed for the job. But the valves which have to activate to re-divert the steam, all six valves on a total of three fueled reactors, eventually failed too. At reactors 1 and 3 these systems worked, but switched off at reactor 1 within an hour and off at reactor 3 after running for more than two days. No one has been able to explain why these systems switched off all by themselves, when they need a powered command to switch off. At reactor 2 they were never allowed to activate. This can only happen if the control system tells them to shut off or stay off, absent intervention from the controller they automatically and seamlessly switch cooling modes to passive rather than electrical.
Some readers may remember that the real issue at Fukushima was malfunctioning valves, and the need to get someone past the radiation to open them. These are the valves that were spoken of. Because Stuxnet kept the readouts normal, no one knew this system was not functioning until major problems happened, flooding the area in which the valves are located with radiation. This prevented last ditch efforts (running and cutting the wires). One automatic valve jamming and mechanically failing would be a surprise; six failing can only be sabotage.
In addition to this, another completely independent separately piped backup with an entirely different electronic decision tree which injects borated water at a pre-charged 3,500 PSI into the reactor to irrevocably shut down all chain reactions (reactor rebuild required) also simultaneously failed at all three fueled reactors. The borated water systems have explosive operated valves so reliable that even one out of three failing would be a ten thousand to one possibility, if that. The reliability of the borated water systems is technically theoretically assured. All three failing at the same time at Fukushima can only mean sabotage.
High pressure in all of the reactors proves the quake did not damage any of the infrastructure at Fukushima because any leaks would have let the pressure go. In addition to this, the seismic readings at Fukushima were 6.07. Fukushima was designed to handle being at the epicenter of an 8.
The media keeps harping about how all the water went away. It did so because these three backup systems were prevented from cooling the reactor which caused the water to boil off and never be replaced. High pressures were talked about constantly in the press; This means beyond a doubt that all six steam-powered backup systems were intact, and all three borated water systems were also intact because if they were not the pressure would have escaped through them. Absent emergency backup control power keeping the virus alive; (control power Magna BSP admitted was there the whole time by mistake when they said their cameras and supporting computers captured the explosions and maintained a data link) the valves which control these systems would have opened when the generators failed and there would have been no disaster. Three worst case scenarios where all nine automatic valves across nine separate emergency backup systems are held shut by the controller when no power should have been present to prevent them from activating can only mean sabotage.
A historical perspective of Fukushima shows the hydrogen blasts were bogus:
Hydrogen blasts could not have damaged Fukushima so badly; this is a media-fed lie. If hydrogen gas mixed with air could produce blasts strong enough to blow reactor containment buildings to pieces, which are among the strongest structures on earth (exceeded in strength only by structures like Hoover Dam), then hydrogen gas filled bombs would be the prime military option. In reality, the Three Mile Island incident proved hydrogen ignition in open air after reactor meltdown is likely to scare employees, while causing no damage at all to the facility, as was the case there. It is extremely important to know the differences between the boiling water reactor design and the design of Chernobyl. At Chernobyl, a hydrogen blast DID cause destruction of the facility, but it was because the reactor design caused hydrogen and oxygen at a perfect ratio to ignite at thousands of PSI inside the reactor pressure vessel. That's a big difference from hydrogen alone igniting in relatively oxygen starved open air at one atmosphere (14.5 PSI). The difference would be similar to the difference between a small firecracker and a case of dynamite; there were many orders of magnitude lower blast potential at Fukushima.
Just to be absolutely safe after the Three Mile Island incident, many nuclear facilities installed hydrogen hard vent stacks hooked directly up to the relief valves on their reactors, and Fukushima was one of them. This was to prevent a hydrogen buildup in the containment building in the event of a core meltdown, which caused a minor explosion at Three Mile Island. These stacks are the tall white towers you see in the photographs of Fukushima, and they are effective in getting rid of hydrogen buildup, are directly piped, and vent completely outside. "Hard piped" means that the electrical failures would have had nothing to do with the blasts, because a hard vent is exactly thatno fan needed at all because the system is sealed. Even if the hard piping at all three fueled Fukushima reactors failed entirely, it should not have been any worse than Three Mile Island which did not have any hard venting to begin with. While hydrogen venting might be a problem if it ignited, it would not mean the death of a facility. It makes no sense that at Fukushima we had a nuclear weapon style mushroom cloud far in excess of the highest yield conventional bomb.
Below are the Classified Photos
What then, caused the explosions? The containment walls were at their thinnest points in the lowest allowed General Electric design a minimum of 4 foot thick steel reinforced concrete, were likely to be a minimum of 8 feet thick, and were totally blown away. All concrete was stripped from the rebar, which was left dangling. Reactor 3 vanished entirely, as seen in the classified photo used to compare the destruction to the diagram and reactor 4 appears to have been blown to pieces as seen in this classified photo. The yellow dome which should be sitting on top of reactor 4 can be clearly seen on the wrong side of the containment building. This type of destruction is indicative of hard weaponry in use; a hydrogen air mix will not do that. Reactors are not made out of tinfoil. On top of this, there was no potential for an explosion at reactor 4 at all, it had been defueled. SO WHAT, PRAY TELL, BLEW IT APART? That's the dirty question no one is askinghow did that happen?
To give you an idea of how big the reactors at Fukushima were, look at this. It's the top of the same make and model at Fukushima's American twin, TVA owned Brown's Ferry, and it is only the top. The yellow dome sits above this, and is even bigger. (Here the yellow dome has been removed for refueling). Over 150 feet of reactor sits below that cap. Hydrogen will not vaporize that, which appears to be what happened to #3, only a nuclear weapon would. Reactors are about 14 digits beyond incapable of going supercritical even with a complete core meltdown. The reactors did not explode, something placed in their vicinity did.
Magna BSP had access to the reactors at this facility. They were based in Dimona, which is an Israeli military base that manufactures nuclear weapons. Stuxnet was made in their yard. They are stated to be a military company.
There is extremely strong evidence that Dimona-based Magna BSP placed nuclear weapons at the exploded or vanished reactors at Fukushima, possibly hidden inside one of their unbelievably GIANT stereoscopic cameras. These cameras were installed inside the reactor containment of Fukushima reactor 3 under the cover of a security contract in the year prior to the disaster. These cameras are identical in size and appearance to a gun type nuclear weapon. Since previous hydrogen explosions at boiling water reactors have never caused any sort of damage to equipment or buildings, even during complete meltdowns, it begs the question how on earth one at reactor 3 produced a mushroom cloud. Three Mile Island sits in the evidence pool against what we have been told about Fukushima. History does matter.
One problem with the reporting in the mainstream media is that it failed to convey just how massive and strong the containment structures really were, as seen in this classified photo. A hydrogen explosion would only blow the sheet metal off the steel framed roof if it even did that; at Three Mile Island the hydrogen ignition did nothing at all. It just scared employees. Another thing the reporting failed to convey is the gravity of the disaster. Compare the containment diagram to the remains of reactor 3. It is painfully obvious that many tons of highly radioactive plutonium in the containment pools is nowhere to be found, the entire floor they were on is completely gone. We are being lied to.
That was a LOT more than a hydrogen blast, and as a result there are thousands of pounds of plutonium scattered everywhere. TEPCO was ridiculed for initially stating that the radiation from the facility was "immeasurable." I think they at first told the truth. Now they have this story about the Fukushima 50. Is it in fact a "wag the dog"? No one could be there and live. Why is remote controlled heavy equipment doing the cleanup? The official story is hydrogen blasts, not nukes, so the story line has to at least be within the far outer limits of what a hydrogen blast could actually accomplish; not missing reactors and entire fuel pools blown away.
I suggest you ponder the pictures and materials presented and reach your own conclusion. A government issued training manual for the reactors at Fukushima is here.
Now that Osama, who has been dead for 10 years, is officially dead, Al Qaeda is going to use a nuke, so they say; I strongly urge you to consider this article if a nuke actually does go off somewhere or if other nuclear facilities start acting like Fukushima.
The only reason I believe the management at Fukushima is not telling it like it really was is because victim status has been so well asserted by the ethnic group in question that it is career suicide to point the finger at them, even when they try to kill you. I find it interesting that all 12 non-Japanese employees of Magna BSP returned to Israel a week before the tsunami . . . . .
I might have understood the need for Stuxnet if its use would have ended with Iran. Unfortunately that does not appear to be the case. I do hope this article breaks their toy.
For those of you who are reluctant to re-post this because the wording is too strong, I ask you to consider this:
The real answer came out of Fukushima. We have a member of the international community which has already done horrendous damage to a very advanced and (presently) innocent civilization and we simply cannot continue to tolerate it. Consider what ignoring this will cost you. Are you prepared to have a major disaster at the convenience of the couch; because you sat there watching TV rather than going over to your computer to at least spread the word? We really need a serious wake up call. Please let this post be it, rather than some other unforeseen disaster.
In Newsletter 679 we reported that "the US Air Force and Navy has provided a visual insight into what caused the 9.0 magnitude off Japan on March 11, 2011 at 05:46:23 UTC. . . a time-frequency spectrogram, which shows the frequency content of signals recorded by the HAARP Induction Magnetometer. . ."
Correspondent Andrew S. MacGregor suggests, "My personal feeling is that Fukushima was the result of two separate attacks, the first to cause the earthquake/tsunami, and then the second to take out the nuclear power plant. The ongoing hysteria to divert our minds from these original attacks, but I cannot see the Israelis involved in this attack as the Japanese are not stupid, but America has been demonstrated to cause the 1995 Great Hanshin or Kobe earthquake after the 'Opposition' finally got into power, and the Hanshin earthquake prevented Japan's banks from outdoing the Yank banks. I also understand that the Opposition got back into power just before the Fukushima incident, and there is no reason to believe any different this time."
"Again, why have a 'stuxnet virus' attack along with a 'nuclear bomb' attack. That also does not make sense, as only one is required, and 'an apparent act of God' (such as the earthquake/tsunami cannot be blamed on mere humans, can it? That is why I absolutely love this quote from the book Open Verdict by Tony Collins, coming from Joe Viall's mouth":
"It is possible," he says, "for the subconscious to be clandestinely influenced to such a degree that people can be 'tricked' into killing themselves. Such a system, he asserts, provides the perfect solution for a democracy wanting to remove a small number of people who are predisposed to endanger national security. The system is inherently safe because the public would be unable to comprehend that it was possible."
"Please really consider this, as this is the 'Star Wars' that President Reagan instigated. The pertinent part of the quote is that the general public would not be able to comprehend the actual attack. If Joe Vialls stated this in 1987 to Tony Collins, then think about all of the articles that Joe wrote in regard to 'terrorist' attacks throughout the world from 1995."
Please read Genesis 3:15. Now read it again, and review world history from the "Fall" to the present day. Fukushima is yet another "false flag" black operation for the 'City of London' perpetrated by their colonies of occupied Israel and occupied United States of America.
Mails from Japan, the true perspective; Why the Silence in Nebraska? Special update for Japanese readers nl694.htm
Pass it on . . . please send this article to someone you know
Brother Grigor-Scott is a non-denominational minister who has ministered full-time since 1981, primarily to other ministers and their congregations overseas. He pastors Bible Believers' tiny congregation, and is available to teach in your church.